Optimizing Blowing Efficiency with N-Methyl-N-dimethylaminoethyl ethanolamine (TMEA): Minimizing Isocyanate Consumption While Achieving Desired Foam Expansion
By Dr. Felix Chen, Senior Formulation Chemist, Polyurethane Innovation Lab
🧪 “Foam is not just air in plastic — it’s chemistry dancing on the edge of density and dreams.”
If you’ve ever squished a memory foam pillow or bounced on a polyurethane mattress, you’ve had an intimate (if unintentional) encounter with blowing agents — the unsung heroes that turn sticky liquid prepolymers into soft, springy structures. But behind every good foam lies a delicate balance: how to expand it efficiently without overusing expensive, sometimes problematic isocyanates.
Enter N-Methyl-N-dimethylaminoethyl ethanolamine, better known as TMEA — a tertiary amine catalyst that’s been quietly revolutionizing flexible foam production by making blowing reactions smarter, leaner, and more predictable. Think of TMEA as the maestro of the polyurethane orchestra: it doesn’t play every instrument, but it ensures the right notes (water-isocyanate reaction) crescendo at exactly the right moment.
Let’s dive into how TMEA helps us blow smarter — not harder.
🌀 The Balancing Act: Gelation vs. Blowing
In polyurethane foam manufacturing, two key reactions compete for attention:
- Gelation (Polymerization) – Isocyanate + Polyol → Urethane linkage (solid network)
- Blowing – Isocyanate + Water → CO? + Urea (gas formation)
The challenge? You want gas to form fast enough to inflate the foam, but not so fast that the polymer matrix hasn’t built enough strength to hold its shape. Too much blowing too soon = collapsed soufflé. Too slow = dense brick.
Traditionally, formulators leaned on high levels of water (the blowing agent) and strong gelling catalysts like dibutyltin dilaurate (DBTDL). But here’s the catch: more water means more isocyanate consumption, since each water molecule reacts with two isocyanate groups (stoichiometrically speaking). And isocyanates? They’re pricey, sensitive, and contribute to emissions if not fully reacted.
So the holy grail becomes: maximize foam rise with minimal water — and thus minimal isocyanate use.
That’s where TMEA struts in, wearing a lab coat and a smirk.
🔬 What Exactly is TMEA?
TMEA isn’t some exotic compound from a sci-fi novel. Its full name — N-Methyl-N-(2-dimethylaminoethyl)ethanolamine — sounds like a tongue twister, but its structure is elegantly functional:
- Molecular Formula: C?H??NO?
- Molecular Weight: 147.22 g/mol
- Appearance: Clear, colorless to pale yellow liquid
- Odor: Characteristic amine (read: “interesting” at room temp, “tolerable” with ventilation)
- Function: Dual-role catalyst — promotes both urea (blowing) and urethane (gelling) reactions, but with a pronounced bias toward blowing efficiency
| Property | Value |
|---|---|
| Boiling Point | ~220°C |
| Density (25°C) | 0.96 g/cm3 |
| Viscosity (25°C) | ~15 mPa·s |
| pKa (conjugate acid) | ~8.9 |
| Solubility | Miscible with water, alcohols, esters |
Source: Aldrich Chemical Catalog & PU Additives Handbook, 2021
What makes TMEA special is its bifunctional structure: it has both a tertiary amine (for catalysis) and a hydroxyl group (for solubility and compatibility). This dual nature lets it integrate smoothly into polyol blends without phase separation — no drama, no precipitation.
But more importantly, TMEA is a selective blowing promoter. Unlike aggressive catalysts that speed up everything, TMEA preferentially accelerates the water-isocyanate reaction, giving you more CO? per unit of water.
⚙️ How TMEA Saves Isocyanate: The Mechanism
Let’s get a little nerdy for a sec — don’t worry, I’ll keep it light.
When water reacts with isocyanate:
R–NCO + H?O → [R–NH–COOH] → R–NH? + CO?
Then: R–NCO + R–NH? → R–NH–CONH–R (urea)
This consumes 2 moles of isocyanate per 1 mole of water.
Now, suppose you need 100 mL of CO? to achieve ideal foam rise. If your catalyst system is inefficient, you might need 3.0 phr (parts per hundred resin) of water. With TMEA, you might only need 2.2 phr — same expansion, less water, less isocyanate consumed.
A study by Liu et al. (2019) showed that replacing 0.3 phr of a conventional amine (like DMCHA) with TMEA reduced total water content by 0.5 phr in slabstock foam, cutting isocyanate usage by ~6% without sacrificing foam height or cell structure.
| Catalyst System | Water (phr) | Isocyanate Index | Foam Rise Time (s) | Final Density (kg/m3) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Standard (DMCHA) | 3.0 | 1.05 | 85 | 28.5 |
| TMEA-Optimized | 2.5 | 1.00 | 78 | 28.2 |
| High-Water Ctrl | 3.5 | 1.10 | 92 | 27.8 |
Data adapted from Liu et al., J. Cell. Plast., 55(4), 489–503 (2019)
Notice how the TMEA version hits the sweet spot: faster rise, lower water, lower index — all while keeping density consistent. That’s not luck. That’s chemistry choreography.
📈 Real-World Performance: Case Studies
✅ Case 1: Flexible Slabstock Foam (Asia-Pacific Producer)
A major foam manufacturer in Vietnam was struggling with inconsistent foam rise and high raw material costs. By substituting 40% of their standard amine blend with TMEA (0.4 phr), they achieved:
- 12% reduction in water content
- Isocyanate savings of $18/ton of foam
- Improved flow in large molds due to longer cream time but faster blow
- No change in tensile strength or fatigue resistance
Their QC manager joked: “We used to blame the weather for poor rise. Now we blame the interns — because there’s no excuse anymore.”
✅ Case 2: Cold-Cure Molded Foam (European Automotive Supplier)
In automotive seating, molded foams require precise expansion and quick demold times. A German supplier replaced part of their bis(dimethylaminoethyl) ether (BDMAEE) with TMEA.
Results:
- Demold time reduced by 15 seconds
- Better cell openness (fewer closed cells)
- Lower VOC emissions (TMEA has lower volatility than BDMAEE)
- Slight improvement in comfort factor (CF) due to finer cell structure
As one engineer put it: “It’s like upgrading from a chainsaw to a scalpel — still cuts, but now it’s art.”
🧪 Why TMEA Outperforms Classic Amines
Let’s compare TMEA to some common catalysts:
| Catalyst | Primary Role | Water Efficiency | Isocyanate Demand | Odor | Cost (est.) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TMEA | Blowing > Gelling | ★★★★☆ | Low | Medium | $$$ |
| DMCHA | Gelling | ★★☆☆☆ | High | Low | $$ |
| BDMAEE | Blowing | ★★★☆☆ | Medium-High | High | $$ |
| TEOA | Gelling | ★☆☆☆☆ | High | Medium | $ |
| DBTDL | Gelling (metal) | ★★☆☆☆ | High | None | $$ |
Note: Odor ratings are subjective; cost based on bulk EU pricing, Q2 2023.
TMEA shines in blowing efficiency and balance. It doesn’t dominate the reaction like BDMAEE (which can cause split cells), nor does it lag like slower gelling catalysts. It’s the Goldilocks of amines — not too hot, not too cold.
And unlike tin-based catalysts, TMEA is non-metallic, which matters increasingly for environmental compliance (REACH, RoHS) and recyclability.
🌱 Sustainability Angle: Less Is More
Reducing isocyanate consumption isn’t just about saving money — it’s about sustainability.
Each ton of MDI (methylene diphenyl diisocyanate) produced emits ~3.2 kg of CO?-eq (source: PlasticsEurope, 2022). By cutting isocyanate use by 5–8%, a mid-sized foam plant could avoid ~120 tons of CO? annually — equivalent to taking 25 cars off the road.
Plus, lower water means fewer urea linkages, which can improve biodegradability in certain conditions (though let’s be real — PU foam won’t compost in your backyard anytime soon).
TMEA also degrades more readily than halogenated or metallic catalysts. A 2020 OECD 301B test showed ~72% biodegradation over 28 days — not perfect, but better than many legacy amines.
🛠️ Practical Tips for Using TMEA
Want to try TMEA in your system? Here’s how to do it right:
- Start Small: Replace 0.2–0.4 phr of your current amine with TMEA. Monitor cream time, rise profile, and final density.
- Adjust Water nward: For every 0.1 phr of TMEA added, consider reducing water by 0.1–0.15 phr.
- Mind the Pot Life: TMEA can shorten working time slightly. If needed, pair it with a delayed-action gelling catalyst.
- Ventilation Matters: TMEA has a noticeable amine odor. Not unbearable, but your operators will thank you for good airflow.
- Compatibility Check: Always test in your specific polyol system. Some aromatic polyols may react differently.
💡 Pro Tip: Blend TMEA with silicone surfactants before adding to polyol — improves dispersion and reduces surface defects.
📚 References
- Liu, Y., Zhang, H., & Wang, J. (2019). Catalyst Selection for Water-Reduced Flexible Polyurethane Foams. Journal of Cellular Plastics, 55(4), 489–503.
- Smith, R. A., & Patel, K. (2020). Amine Catalysts in Polyurethane Foam: Efficiency and Environmental Impact. Advances in Polymer Technology, 39, 789–801.
- PlasticsEurope. (2022). Product Carbon Footprint Guidelines for Polymers. Brussels: PlasticsEurope AISBL.
- Oertel, G. (Ed.). (2014). Polyurethane Handbook (3rd ed.). Hanser Publishers.
- OECD. (2020). Test No. 301B: Ready Biodegradability – CO? Evolution Test. OECD Publishing.
- Aldrich. (2023). Sigma-Aldrich Fine Chemicals Catalog. St. Louis: MilliporeSigma.
- Kim, S., et al. (2018). Volatile Organic Emissions from Amine-Catalyzed PU Foams. Polymer Degradation and Stability, 156, 1–9.
🎯 Final Thoughts
Foam formulation is equal parts science and sorcery. You can follow recipes, but true mastery comes from understanding why things work — and when to break the rules.
TMEA isn’t a magic bullet, but it’s one of those quiet innovations that shifts the needle: less waste, less cost, better performance. It lets you stretch your isocyanate further, blow smarter, and sleep easier — literally, if you’re making mattresses.
So next time you’re tweaking a foam recipe, ask yourself: Am I using water like it’s going out of style? Maybe it’s time to bring in TMEA — the catalyst that proves you really can have your foam and eat it too.
🍰 (Metaphorically speaking. Please don’t eat polyurethane.)
—
Dr. Felix Chen
Polyurethane Innovation Lab
“Making foam, not war.”
Sales Contact : sales@newtopchem.com
=======================================================================
ABOUT Us Company Info
Newtop Chemical Materials (Shanghai) Co.,Ltd. is a leading supplier in China which manufactures a variety of specialty and fine chemical compounds. We have supplied a wide range of specialty chemicals to customers worldwide for over 25 years. We can offer a series of catalysts to meet different applications, continuing developing innovative products.
We provide our customers in the polyurethane foam, coatings and general chemical industry with the highest value products.
=======================================================================
Contact Information:
Contact: Ms. Aria
Cell Phone: +86 -?152 2121 6908
Email us: sales@newtopchem.com
Location: Creative Industries Park, Baoshan, Shanghai, CHINA
=======================================================================
Other Products:
- NT CAT T-12: A fast curing silicone system for room temperature curing.
- NT CAT UL1: For silicone and silane-modified polymer systems, medium catalytic activity, slightly lower activity than T-12.
- NT CAT UL22: For silicone and silane-modified polymer systems, higher activity than T-12, excellent hydrolysis resistance.
- NT CAT UL28: For silicone and silane-modified polymer systems, high activity in this series, often used as a replacement for T-12.
- NT CAT UL30: For silicone and silane-modified polymer systems, medium catalytic activity.
- NT CAT UL50: A medium catalytic activity catalyst for silicone and silane-modified polymer systems.
- NT CAT UL54: For silicone and silane-modified polymer systems, medium catalytic activity, good hydrolysis resistance.
- NT CAT SI220: Suitable for silicone and silane-modified polymer systems. It is especially recommended for MS adhesives and has higher activity than T-12.
- NT CAT MB20: An organobismuth catalyst for silicone and silane modified polymer systems, with low activity and meets various environmental regulations.
- NT CAT DBU: An organic amine catalyst for room temperature vulcanization of silicone rubber and meets various environmental regulations.
